BERKLEY, Calif. — It’s claimed that massage can relieve all sorts of pain—everything from arthritis pain to migraines—though it has been hard to prove this. That’s why a recent large well-designed study on massage for back pain, funded by the National Institutes of Health and published in the Annals of Internal Medicine, deserves attention, and reported in the Berkley Wellness Newsletter.
The study included 400 people who had chronic “nonspecific” low back pain—meaning it had no identified cause, such as a fracture or herniated disk. One group received relaxation (Swedish) massage, another got structural massage (focusing on specific muscles, tendons, and ligaments potentially related to the pain), and the third group just continued with their usual care (whatever that was).
The massages lasted about an hour and were done once a week. After 10 weeks, two out of three people in both massage groups reported substantially reduced pain and improved mobility, compared to only one in three in the control group. Four months later, those who had gotten the massages still fared better than those who did not, but the difference was less. Another six months later, though, any benefits were pretty much gone.
It was somewhat surprising that relaxation massage worked as well as structural massage. But that’s good news, according to the researchers, since it is more widely available and usually less expensive than more specialized forms (though also less likely to be covered by insurance).
Despite the positive results, the study left unanswered questions:
• How does massage compare to other treatments, such as exercise, yoga, medication, or acupuncture? The study did not compare them, but one of the researchers suggested that the benefits of massage are as strong as those reported for these other effective therapies.
• Would fewer or shorter sessions have been as beneficial? On the other hand, if the weekly massages had continued, would improvements have increased, leveled off, or lessened over time?