It is a little hard to gauge from the photos in the newspaper, but John Carlson's tree house for his daughter looked like it was going to be a whopper.
And it was headed for the front yard. And it really looked more like a "stump house" than a tree house.
But from the perspective of an 11-year-old, a project built by her dad was likely to be a palace in any shape, dimension or location.
So when the early construction ran afoul of the borough zoning regulations in Selinsgrove and it looked as if young Samantha and her friends might not get to have their abode, reader reaction lit up the dailyitem.com website and Facebook page.
Yes, yes, rules are rules and well-ordered zoning is certainly worth maintaining for the greater public good. But we are not talking about a junkyard or an incinerator.
The day will come when Samantha and her posse climb down from the stump for prom night or a driver's license, or maybe to head off to college or some other adventure toward adulthood in the wide, wide world.
In addition to a fair number of strangers who would like Mr. Carlson to be able to make a tree house for his daughter, a few neighbors mentioned that it wouldn't bother them all that much.
Who else is there that this regulation was intended to protect? Is there a safety inspector to see that the structure remains on its stump? An animal control officer to assure that unclaimed cats don't take up residence there? Maybe a health officer to see that it remains mold-free? Perhaps a fire chief would like an automatic sprinkler system?
This is not a topic for outrage. Certainly, the public reaction has been regretful, sympathetic and helpful.