Published June 15, 2008 09:18 am - Baghdad was on the verge of anarchy when former Selinsgrove resident Dan Bisbee arrived in February 2007. There was sectarian violence in the streets, with various religious groups fighting one another, suicide bombers an everyday threat, and everyone was shooting at Americans.
Selinsgrove native: Future looks positive for Iraq
Iraqis seeing better days in Baghdad
By Wayne Laepple
The Daily Item
SELINSGROVE — Baghdad was on the verge of anarchy when former Selinsgrove resident Dan Bisbee arrived in February 2007.
There was sectarian violence in the streets, with various religious groups fighting one another, suicide bombers an everyday threat, and everyone was shooting at Americans.
Survival was the prime concern.
By the end of his tour of duty last month, much had changed. Community services such as electricity and water were becoming available. The political parties were making deals with each other, not killing each other.
“The city government was discussing how many swimming pools would open,” he said. “They were holding policy debates.”
Bisbee was a U.S. Department of State employee, a member of the Provincial Reconstruction Team advising the government of the Province of Baghdad. He was one of about 100 American civilians, from the state, defense and justice departments, working with Iraqi-American translators and Iraqi professionals, helping the Iraqis in charge of the city and province to build their own democratic government.
Bids for attention
He first visited Iraq in February 2005 as a U.S. Army captain, working with Baghdad city officials as an officer in the Army’s civil affairs branch, and after his deployment to Iraq was completed, he went back as a civilian.
His job with the PRT coincided with the U.S. military surge in Baghdad, analyzing how the surge worked and how troops and U.S. civilians would be deployed in and around Baghdad.
From his time in the military, Bisbee was familiar with how the various factions worked. Their interactions and interests were much more varied than many in the U.S. understand.
“There are differences between the insurgents and the extremists,” he explained. “The insurgents want a change in government to their advantage, while the extremists want to destroy the government and replace it with their vision.”
In the simplest terms, Bisbee said, the violence is a bid for attention.
Sometimes the different factions work together if they have similar goals, but at other times they may fight one another. One example he cited was how some of the insurgent groups were allied with al-Qaeda earlier in the conflict but turned against al-Qaeda when they tried to enforce strict Islamic law.
“They weren’t interested in that at all,” he said.
Stability and credibility