The Daily Item, Sunbury, PA


July 3, 2013

It’s now much easier to be harassed at work

When I daydream, I envision a workplace where people are nice to one another and everyone gets along.

I also envision wearing a jet pack, flying across the city and landing, to great applause, in a Dairy Queen parking lot where I’m given buckets of free ice cream.

Sadly, it’s the second fantasy that’s more likely to come true. Workplaces invariably contain non-nice people, including those whose non-niceness rises to the level of harassment.

Thanks to two recent rulings by the U.S. Supreme Court, workplace harassers - and the companies that employ them - are more likely to get away with making other people’s lives miserable.

Generally speaking, it’s easier for employees to hold companies liable for harassment if the harasser is a supervisor. It’s a higher bar for a company to be liable for behavior among co-workers.

But in the first of these two cases, the justices narrowed the definition of a supervisor. They said that for a company to be liable in racial or sexual harassment cases, the harasser has to be a supervisor who has authority to hire, fire or demote an employee. Many of the country’s lower courts had previously defined a supervisor as a person in charge of your day-to-day activity, which I’d argue is the logical definition of the term.

That effectively turns most middle managers in America - and in cases where human resources departments are in charge of hiring and firing, possibly all managers - into a “co-worker.“

“The effect of that is where you have employees who have their day-to-day work controlled by other employees, if those employees harass the people who work under them, those people may be reasonably nervous about complaining,“ said Deborah Widiss, an employment discrimination expert and associate professor at the Indiana University Maurer School of Law. “And if they do complain, the employer is far less likely to be held responsible.“

In her dissent, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote: “We can expect that, as a consequence of restricting the supervisor category to those formally empowered to take tangible employment actions, victims of workplace harassment with meritorious Title VII claims will find suit a hazardous endeavor.“

To make matters worse, the court’s second ruling makes it harder for workers to prevail in retaliation lawsuits involving Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which protects against employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex and national origin.

For example, an employee who claims he was fired or overlooked for a promotion because he filed a discrimination complaint must now prove that the complaint was the primary reason behind the company’s decision. In other words, had he not filed the complaint, he would not have been fired or overlooked for the promotion.

Before, the employee would’ve needed only to prove the complaint was a motivating factor in the decision.

“I think employees who do feel they’re subject to harassing conduct won’t feel comfortable making a complaint to human resources or asking someone to look into it,“ Widiss said. “Because then if they get retaliated against, they have to prove something that’s difficult to prove - that if I’d never made that complaint, then this other thing would never have happened to me.“

She added: “We know that fear of retaliation is already a major reason why employees are hesitant to report discriminatory conduct. There’s plenty of survey data and even anecdotal data showing that the risk of retaliation is a prime reason people don’t complain. So anything that waters down the level of protection to employees who do complain will obviously make it worse.“

Businesses are, of course, declaring these two decisions victories that will cut down on frivolous lawsuits.

It’s undeniable that there are too many meritless workplace lawsuits. But there is also too much day-to-day harassment in workplaces, and I don’t think the solution is to make it easier for companies to ignore.

In most, if not all, cases, corporations will follow the least expensive path. It’s cheaper to train people to treat others properly and to weed out the dirtbags than it is to lose Title VII lawsuits. But if the threat of litigation isn’t high enough, you better believe that training and weeding out is going to be dropped, and fast.

In her dissent, Ginsburg wrote: “The ball is once again in Congress’ court to correct the error into which this Court has fallen and to restore the robust protections against workplace harassment the Court weakens today.“

I concur.

Applaud all you want for decisions that give greater power to businesses. I’ll take my jet pack and keep buzzing around on the side of the workers. The ones our government, and our laws, should be protecting.

Rex Huppke writes for the Chicago Tribune. Send him questions by email at or on Twitter RexWorksHere.


Text Only
  • The Color of Money: No easy way to get out of debt

    Many people who are deeply in debt are desperate for a quick fix. They ask the question: What can I do to get out of debt?

    July 21, 2014

  • Watercooler: When to speak up if you see problems down the line

    Q: Our organization has hired a new director. I am one of a number of division heads; above us, there's the associate director, and above him is the director. The associate director is feared and disliked for his duplicity and dictatorial nature, though few have come forward because of his vindictiveness.

    July 18, 2014

  • Career Coach: Bringing a purpose-driven spirit to work

    Increasingly, religious beliefs and practices of employees are becoming more evident in the workplace. Religious diversity and concepts of spirituality are more prevalent in organizational settings.

    July 18, 2014

  • Ask the Mompreneur: It’s best to farm out your payroll

    When my husband and I hired our first employee at our Web development company, we had it easy when it came to doing payroll.

    July 17, 2014

  • Protecting against unnecessary losses

    QUESTION: I run a small bar and grill which is open 7 days a week and have to rely on others for some of the shifts. How can I ensure employees have not become my partners?

    July 17, 2014

  • A checklist for keeping you focused at work

    A quick check of Facebook and next thing you know, a half-hour’s passed. Start chatting with a co-worker and suddenly 20 minutes is gone and the report you were supposed to finish by lunch is late.
    Workplace distractions are everywhere, especially in an age of social media and open-plan offices. In the face of so much temptation, accomplishing what you’re paid to do can be tough.

    July 16, 2014

  • It could be time for a career coach

    Need a little help figuring out your next career move?
    If you’re putting in the hours and still not seeing the rewards, feeling undervalued or simply striving to be more successful, it may be time to hire a career coach.

    July 16, 2014

  • Your Office Coach: Turn to boss for help with disgruntled underling

    QUESTION: When I joined this company a few weeks ago, I discovered that the person who previously held my position is now working for me. “Sarah” obviously resents my presence and frequently says I don’t have the authority to manage her, even though I clearly do. Her negativity has made my job much more difficult.

    July 15, 2014

  • You are not trusted

    If it seems like employers don’t trust employees - well, they don’t.

    July 15, 2014

  • The Color of Money: Beware of loan-modification scammers

    There are some good things going on in the economy these days. Just like temperatures across the country, the stock market has been hot lately. The economy added 288,000 jobs in June. The unemployment rate dropped to 6.1 percent. Yet there are still plenty of Americans who need financial help, especially with their mortgages.

    July 14, 2014

Business Video